3 Comments
User's avatar
Michael Constan's avatar

The MAHA report was most likely AI generated (AI-degenerated?) From all accounts, AI is only suitable for fiction.

Expand full comment
Mike Pesca's avatar

PROMPT: Rebuttal to Michael Constan’s AI Dismissal of the MAHA Report

(Voice: smart, composed, pointed)

Michael Constan says the MAHA Report was “most likely AI-generated,” and suggests that AI is “only suitable for fiction.” That’s a clever line—cute even—but it collapses under scrutiny. AI didn’t invent fake studies or attribute fabricated work to real scientists; people did that, sloppily. Or worse, deliberately.

If AI was involved, it’s a failure of human oversight, not machine capability. And if AI wasn’t involved—well, then the problem is even more basic: a government commission released a report that reads like it was cobbled together on a deadline, fact-checking be damned. Blaming AI is a dodge. Accountability still lies with the humans who signed off.

Expand full comment
Michael Constan's avatar

Agreed on the second part; the problem is too much human error. My number one concern is that education, governmental agencies, and the corporate world will institute the use of AI without any quality control.

Expand full comment